Considerations for partnering with Ryan White Case Managers to create equitable opportunities for people with HIV to participate in research.

Many research studies focus on recruitment from one or few HIV clinics or internet-engaged populations, but this may result in inequitable representation of people with HIV (PWH), across the rural/urban/suburban continuum. Ryan White Case Managers (RWCM) meet regularly with PWH, potentially positioning them as partners in gathering research-related data from diverse groups of low-income, marginalized, PWH. Yet, data collection in partnership with RWCM, particularly over large geographic areas, has been under-explored. We partnered with RWCM and their organizations throughout Florida to administer a 10-item technology use and willingness survey to clients living with HIV; RWCMs provided process-oriented feedback. Among 382 approached RWCM, 71% completed human subjects and survey administration training; 48% gathered data on 10 predetermined survey administration days; and 68% administered at least one survey during the entire period for survey administration. Altogether, 1,268 client surveys were completed, 2.7% by rural participants. Stigma, privacy concerns, and disinterest reportedly inhibited client participation; competing obligations, policies, and narrow recruitment windows prevented some RWCM from offering the survey to clients. Research should further explore strategies and best practices to ensure equitable access to participate in research among PWH.

Stakeholders' perspectives on system-level barriers to and facilitators of HPV vaccination among Hispanic migrant farmworkers.

OBJECTIVES: Latinx populations suffer from a disproportionate burden of HPV-related cancers, yet vaccination completion rates nationally among this population remain low, with 46% of females and 35% of males completing the vaccine series. Given the heterogeneity of Latinx populations, sub-populations such as Latinx individuals who live in migrant farmworker communities experience additional system-level barriers to healthcare utilization. Thus, we examined stakeholder perceptions of barriers and facilitators to Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among Latinx migrant farmworkers. Such information is critical to informing intervention development targeting vaccination uptake and completion, ultimately decreasing HPV-related cancer disparities. DESIGN: Guided by the PRECEDE-PROCEED model and the Social Ecological Model (SEM), interviews were conducted with diverse stakeholders (n = 13) representative of health, social services, and political sectors. Stakeholders were asked about their perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of HPV vaccination among migrant farmworkers. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. Responses were coded according to components of the SEM. RESULTS: Micro-level facilitators identified included positive attitudes and vaccine acceptance among parents. Meso-level facilitators included availability of free or low-cost health care clinics, and macro-level facilitators included federal programs (e.g. Medicaid, Vaccine for Children). Micro-level barriers included lack of education and low health literacy. Meso-level barriers included poor patient-provider communication, lack of access (e.g. clinics not stocking/administering the vaccine; limited clinic hours; lack of reminder systems; insufficient organizational structure), public perceptions/attitudes towards HPV vaccination, and lack of healthcare service continuity due to migratory patterns. Macro-level barriers included public perceptions and attitudes towards HPV vaccination, transportation, vaccine availability and coverage for non-citizens, and lack of school entry policy. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that multi-level interventions should be developed to leverage existing facilitators while addressing system-level barriers, ultimately creating a supportive environment for HPV vaccine initiation and completion among this marginalized population comprised of individuals living in migrant farmworker communities.

A Statewide Evaluation of the Breastfeeding Resource Nurse Model.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a statewide initiative to increase the provisioning of human milk in NICUs. DESIGN: A survey of nurses before participation in an educational session, immediately after education, and again 9 months later. SETTING: Nurses from 22 hospitals throughout Florida. PARTICIPANTS: We surveyed 121 participants, including some nurses who had prior breastfeeding education or certification as well as those without specialized breastfeeding training. INTERVENTION: An educational project called the Breastfeeding Resource Nurse Master program was intended to educate NICU nurses to implement the "Ten Steps to Promote and Protect Human Milk and Breastfeeding in Vulnerable Infants." MEASUREMENT: A quantitative needs assessment survey was administered to participants to determine current hospital practices, policies, and perceived areas for improvement. Pre- and immediate posttraining surveys assessed NICU nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about human milk feeding of critical care infants and their self-efficacy for implementing the program in their respective NICUs. A follow-up, open-ended survey was administered at 9 months to yield information on program implementation. RESULTS: NICU breastfeeding practices varied widely at baseline. Nurses' scores for knowledge, beliefs, and behavioral intentions improved postsession, but the implementation of practice changes related to the Ten Steps for Vulnerable Infants proved difficult. Nurses identified insufficient time and resources as barriers to educating others and changing practice. CONCLUSIONS: Policies and regulations that make hospitals accountable for increasing human milk provision to vulnerable infants may be necessary to ensure that hospitals devote adequate resources to implementing practice changes in this area.

A tailored telehealth group tobacco cessation treatment program for people with HIV: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Smoking-related illnesses are the leading cause of death among people with HIV (PWH). Yet, there are few effective evidence-based interventions that help PWH quit smoking. The group-based program Positively Smoke Free is a biobehavioral cessation intervention for PWH with a growing evidence base. This study builds on prior work of Positively Smoke Free and addresses numerous weaknesses of prior trials for this population. We describe the Positively Quit Trial, a randomized controlled trial comparing a videoconferencing delivered Positively Smoke Free intervention to an attention-matched condition, assessing cessation over a 1-year period. METHODS: This attention-matched, randomized (1:1) controlled trial compares Positively Smoke Free Video-Groups to an updated version of Healthy Relationship Video-Groups. Participants are PWH, aged 18 years and older, who smoke at least one cigarette per day. All are offered nicotine replacement therapy patches and given brief advice to quit. Participants are enrolled in 12 group sessions focusing on either smoking cessation for PWH or broader topics regarding living healthy with HIV; in both conditions, Social Cognitive Theory is the guiding theoretical framework. Participants complete assessments at baseline, days 42, 90, 180, and 360; self-reported abstinence is verified with a video-observed cheek swab sent to a lab and tested for cotinine. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Biochemically confirmed 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence at day 360 is the primary outcome. Cost per quit, sustained abstinence at various timepoints, and biochemical confirmed abstinence at three and six months are secondary outcomes. Effects of smoking cessation on CD4 and virologic suppression are also explored.

Understanding Technology Fit Among People with HIV Based on Intersections of Race, Sex, and Sexual Behavior: An Equitable Approach to Analyzing Differences Across Multiple Social Identities.

HIV disproportionately impacts individuals based on intersecting categories (e.g. gender, race/ethnicity, behavior), with groups most at-risk deemed priority populations. Using weighted effects coding to account for differential group sizes, this study used multilevel mixed logistic models to investigate differences in eHealth use and willingness to use eHealth for HIV-related information among priority populations. Compared to the sample average, Black men who had sex with women were less likely to use all technologies except cellphones with text-messaging and less likely to be willing to use computers and tablets. White and Hispanic men who had sex with men were more likely to use all technologies. No significant differences existed for use or willingness to use cellphones with text-messaging. Future research should consider approaches used here to account for equity and multiple intersecting social identities; practitioners may use these findings or similar local data to ensure fit between eHealth programs and priority populations.

Examining the Factors Affecting PrEP Implementation Within Community-Based HIV Testing Sites in Florida: A Mixed Methods Study Applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

HIV testing/counseling is a critical point during which non-clinical staff could intervene, discuss and/or refer clients for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). This analysis investigated the contextual factors affecting PrEP implementation within HIV testing sites. Two generalized linear mixed models were conducted to estimate PrEP implementation as a function of constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Qualitative interviews were analyzed thematically. Data integration occurred via joint analysis and triangulation. Constructs from the CFIR domain Characteristics of Individuals did not predict PrEP implementation when controlling for demographic characteristics; qualitative data signaled divergent findings in PrEP knowledge. Within the CFIR domains Inner and Outer Settings, relevant priority and available resources predicted PrEP implementation; qualitative data confirmed the importance of available resources and provided insight into the impact of cosmopolitanism and leadership. Addressing the contextual factors that affect PrEP implementation may help HIV testing staff to better implement PrEP programs.

Opportunities for and Perceptions of Integrating Community Health Workers Via the Affordable Care Act: Medicaid Health Homes.

CONTEXT: The Affordable Care Act created opportunities for innovative, cost-saving measures to improve health care access. Community health workers (CHWs) are frontline public health workers who have a close understanding of the communities they serve. States that expanded Medicaid coverage could also create Medicaid Health Homes (MHHs)-virtual health care networks-to coordinate care for people with chronic conditions. New York was the second state to implement MHHs and gave the option to include CHWs as part of the health care team. OBJECTIVE: To understand the perceptions of MHH administrators regarding CHW engagement in MHHs, as well as the facilitators and barriers to adoption in MHHs that are unknown. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Semistructured qualitative interviews (n = 18) were conducted with MHH administrators throughout New York State guided by the Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) framework. Qualitative thematic analysis was used to explore the domains and themes. RESULTS: Most MHH administrators believed that CHWs fit within MHHs. The DOI constructs of compatibility and complexity and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research construct of external policies helped explain CHW integration. CHWs were compatible with MHHs by enrolling patients, helping coordinate patient care, and providing social support. The complexities of CHW integration into MHHs included barriers to CHW integration, no direct reimbursement for their services, lack of clarity for CHW roles and responsibilities, and no explicit external policy for their use in MHHs. CONCLUSIONS: CHWs can, and have, been integrated into the relatively novel Health Home system. While some barriers have prevented their integration into all MHHs, lessons learned could provide guidance for CHW integration into other health care systems in the United States.

Multi-level determinants to HPV vaccination among Hispanic farmworker families in Florida.

Background: HPV vaccination is the primary prevention method for HPV-related cancers, although among Hispanic populations, migrant farmworkers may experience exacerbated challenges to HPV vaccination due to intersecting political, social, and personal contexts. This study explored multi-level determinants of HPV vaccination among Hispanic migrant farmworker families.Methods: Using a community-engaged approach and guided by the socio-ecological model, Intervention Mapping, and PRECEDE-PROCEED constructs, we recruited parents who had a daughter and/or son age 9-15 years from a rural, faith-based, community organization in Florida. Three focus groups (n = 13) were conducted in Spanish and constant comparison methods were used to analyze qualitative data.Results: Micro-level determinants included moderate HPV vaccine knowledge, desire for more HPV vaccine information, concerns about HPV vaccine completion, health/preventive motivations, past experiences with the healthcare system, and parental gender roles related to health care. Macro-level determinants included facilitators (e.g. transportation services, clinics open after work hours, governmental programs) and barriers (e.g. supervisor/employment inflexibility, long clinic wait times) to accessing health care and vaccination in general (including HPV vaccination). Participants shared their preferences for future interventions that would meet the needs of this community, and discussed potential content and mechanisms for receiving HPV information, as well as what might facilitate their overall access, uptake, and completion of the HPV vaccine series.Discussion: Determinants to HPV vaccination emerged and underscore the importance of addressing the multi-level factors when designing and delivering an HPV vaccine intervention for this Hispanic migrant farmworker population. Improving HPV vaccination rates requires responding to situational and structural hardships that disproportionately impact this group. Thus, community-tailored and culturally appropriate multi-level interventions are needed, while emphasizing existing knowledge assets and preferences favorable towards HPV vaccination, with the ultimate goal of the decreasing HPV-related disparities. Findings suggest interventions must reach beyond the individual level to account for this unique population's lived experiences.

Achieve Research Continuity During Social Distancing by Rapidly Implementing Individual and Group Videoconferencing with Participants: Key Considerations, Best Practices, and Protocols.

The novel coronavirus has upended many traditional research procedures as universities and other research entities have closed to activate social distancing. Some social and behavioral research activities (e.g. data analysis, manuscript preparation) can be continued from other environments with appropriate security protocols in place. For studies involving in-person interactions, continuity may be more difficult. Phone-based interactions provide a low-tech solution that may suffice in some cases. Yet, videoconferencing platforms can nearly replicate in-person interactions, activating both auditory and visual senses and potentially resulting in more substantial engagement. Staff can meet with participants individually or in groups, each seeing and hearing one another in real time. This paper provides guidance for researchers transitioning in-person assessments and interventions to a synchronous videoconferencing platform. Best practices, key considerations, examples from the field, and sample protocols are presented to ease transition for ongoing studies and maximize the potential of videoconferencing-and social distancing.

PrEP Implementation Behaviors of Community-Based HIV Testing Staff: A Mixed-Methods Approach Using Latent Class Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is an important option for HIV prevention, but the approach has reached a limited number of people at risk of HIV infection. METHODS: A mixed-methods concurrent triangulation design was used to investigate unobserved subgroups of staff who provide community-based, publicly funded HIV testing in Florida (USA). PrEP implementation groups, or classes, were determined using latent class analysis. Generalized linear mixed models were used to estimate PrEP implementation as a function of staff characteristics. In-depth interviews based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Based on fit statistics and theoretical relevance, a 3-class latent class analysis was selected. Class 1 ("Universal") staff were highly likely to talk about PrEP with their clients, regardless of client eligibility. Class 2 ("Eligibility dependent") staff were most likely to discuss PrEP if they believed their client was eligible. Class 3 ("Limited") staff sometimes spoke to clients about PrEP, but not systematically. In multivariate analyses, only race and sexual orientation remained significant predictors of the PrEP implementation group. Staff who identified as a racial or sexual minority were less likely to be in the Limited group than their heterosexual or white counterparts. Age, gender, ever having taken PrEP, and HIV status did not impact the odds of being in a specific PrEP implementation group. CONCLUSIONS: A subset of HIV testing staff differentially discuss PrEP based on perceived client eligibility; others inconsistently talk to clients about PrEP. Targeted training based on PrEP implementation groups may be beneficial.

Social Determinants of Potential eHealth Engagement Among People Living with HIV Receiving Ryan White Case Management: Health Equity Implications from Project TECH.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the relationships between social characteristics of Floridian persons living with HIV (PLWH) and both use of digital technologies and willingness to use eHealth for HIV-related information. METHODS: Ryan White case managers (N = 155) from 55 agencies in 47 Florida counties administered a survey to PLWH (N = 1268) from June 2016-April 2017. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to identify correlates of technology use and willingness. RESULTS: Use of mobile phones with text messaging was high (89%). Older (vs. younger) adults and non-Hispanic blacks (vs. whites) were less likely to use most technologies. These groups, along with Hispanics (vs. whites) were less likely to express willingness to use technologies for HIV-related information in models adjusting for use. CONCLUSIONS: Among PLWH in Florida, eHealth-related inequities exist. Willingness to engage in HIV-related eHealth is affected by social determinants, even when considering technology access. Although eHealth may reduce some healthcare inequities, it may exacerbate others.

Willingness of MSM Living with HIV to Take Part in Video-Groups: Application of the Technology Readiness and Acceptance Model.

Group-based programs are important for the psychosocial care of people living with HIV; however, programs are often limited by geography and availability. Video-groups, conducted via group-based video-conferencing on video-phones or computer, offer the benefits of group-based programs while overcoming barriers to attendance. This study sought to explore if, and how, the Technology Readiness and Acceptance Model (TRAM) could be used to explain the willingness of men to take part in video-groups. The TRAM was used as the guiding framework for thematic qualitative analysis. Among 106 participants, there was a general willingness to participate in video-groups. TRAM constructs were present in the data-with perceived usefulness (extent that participating in a technology-based program would facilitate group intervention behaviors) and insecurity (distrust/skepticism of technology) emerging as the most salient themes. The TRAM alone did not account for concerns related to group settings or the level of privacy needed when talking about HIV.

Engaging primary care physicians in care coordination for patients with complex medical conditions.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the dynamics of primary care physicians' (PCPs') engagement with the Seamless Care Optimizing the Patient Experience (SCOPE) project. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews. SETTING: Solo and small group primary care practices in urban Toronto, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 22 of the 29 SCOPE PCPs (75.8%) were interviewed 14 to 19 months after the initiation of SCOPE. METHODS: Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted to examine influencing factors associated with PCPs' engagement in SCOPE. Transcripts were analyzed using a grounded theory-informed approach and key themes were identified. MAIN FINDINGS: The SCOPE project provided practical mechanisms through which PCPs could access information and connect with resources. Contextual and historical factors including strained relationships between hospital specialists and community PCPs and PCPs' feelings of responsibility, isolation, disconnection, and burnout influenced readiness to engage. Provision of clinically useful supports in a trusting, collaborative manner encouraged PCPs' engagement in newer, more collaborative ways of working. CONCLUSION: The SCOPE project provided an opportunity for PCPs to build meaningful relationships, reconnect to the broader health care system, and redefine their roles. For many PCPs, reestablishing connections reaffirmed their role in the system and enabled a more collaborative care model. Strategies for connecting community-based PCPs to the broader system need to consider contextual factors and the effects of new linkages and coordination on the identities and relationships of PCPs.

Understanding Women's Willingness to Use e-Health for HIV-Related Services: A Novel Application of the Technology Readiness and Acceptance Model to a Highly Stigmatized Medical Condition.

Background:E-health may expand access to effective behavioral interventions for women living with HIV (WLH), and others living with a highly stigmatized medical condition.Introduction:Theory may help us to understand e-health program uptake. This mixed methods study examined theoretical applications of the Technology Readiness and Acceptance Model (TRAM) to predict willingness to take part in an e-health videoconferencing group program (i.e., participants interacting with each other in real time via videoconferencing) among a group of WLH.Materials and Methods:Women were recruited from HIV/AIDS clinics in an urban area of the southeastern United States. Each participant completed a structured interview. Data were analyzed using a parallel convergent mixed methods design.Results:Participants (N = 91) had a mean age of 43 years and were primarily African American (66%). Despite limited experience with videoconferencing (14.3%), many (71%) reported willingness to attend an intervention via video group for WLH. Qualitative analysis revealed that the constructs of the TRAM (Innovativeness, Optimism, Discomfort, Insecurity, Perceived Usefulness, or Perceived Ease-of-Use) were evident; however, additional mediating factors specific to WLH emerged, including group readiness and HIV-related privacy concerns.Discussion:Group readiness and privacy concerns may be important considerations when applying the TRAM to technology-based group programs for highly stigmatized populations, including WLH.Conclusions:Existing theoretical frameworks may be useful in understanding the willingness of people to take part in group-based e-health interventions, but may need to be modified to account for the role of stigma in e-health program uptake.

Improving Quality of Radiation Therapy Care Across Ontario using a Community-of-Practice Approach.

PURPOSE: In 2003 and 2004, Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) divested its assets and staff to regional hospitals, leading to decreased contact between radiation therapy departments across Ontario's Regional Cancer Centres (RCCs). The Radiation Treatment Program (RTP) at CCO developed a communities-of-practice (CoPs) program to rebuild the provincial radiation therapy community to facilitate collaboration among centers, with the goals of decreasing variation in practice and improving the quality of patient care. RTP's CoPs are led and driven by volunteer frontline health care practitioners who identify and prioritize key quality issues and select corresponding projects to pursue. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An evaluation of RTP's CoPs was conducted to assess whether they were successful in knowledge creation, knowledge transfer and exchange, and community building. The framework was developed based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CoP evaluation framework and tools. Data were collected using prospectively administered member surveys (257 surveys), publications, and semistructured interviews (18 participants). RESULTS: A total of 95% of participants reported that CoP projects were very relevant to their practice, and 50% reported changes in their practice stemming from CoP involvement. In addition, 90% of participants reported growth of their professional network as a result of CoPs. Overall, 93% of participants and 100% of interviewees reported that CoPs are a worthwhile initiative. The largest challenge of CoPs was the time commitment required to participate. CONCLUSIONS: This approach of member-driven CoPs should be explored and modeled in other health care settings as a means to develop and share knowledge to reduce variation in care and improve the quality of radiation therapy care.

The Clinical Specialist Radiation Therapist (CSRT): A case study exploring the effectiveness of a new advanced practice role in Canada.

INTRODUCTION: The Clinical Specialist Radiation Therapist (CSRT), is a new advanced practice (AP) role for radiation therapists (RTTs). Following training, education and evaluation, the CSRT performs specific duties in autonomous ways, making advanced clinical decisions in their area of specialization. This case study examines the CSRT's impact on quantity (i.e., increasing capacity), improving quality and stimulating research and innovation. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2016, 23 CSRTs worked in 10 cancer centres in various AP position. A standardised metrics package, focusing on wait-times, patient volumes, patient throughput, time-savings, quality initiatives, satisfaction, research and innovation was developed and used to collect qualitative and quantitative data. Data were self-reported by the CSRTs but electronic databases, pre/post-studies, surveys and interviews were also used. RESULTS: Quantity projects (n = 76) related to patient volumes, wait-times, patient throughput and time-savings increased capacity and allowed more patients to enter the system. The presence of a CSRT allowed, on average, 13 additional patients (either new or re-treated) to be seen, at their respective cancer centre, per month. An average of 1.4 yearly quality improvement initiatives were led by each CSRT, which contributed to improvements in quality of care and satisfaction. CSRTs demonstrated a high level of involvement in research, innovation and knowledge translation activities, either as leaders or part of interprofessional teams. CONCLUSION: CSRTs positively impact quantity (capacity of the system), quality, research and innovation. Future efforts include permanent and sustainable team integration, practice standards, formal and comprehensive educational preparation, and approaches to consistent, valid assessment of AP in radiation therapy.

Abnormal pap tests among women living in a Hispanic migrant farmworker community: A narrative of health literacy.

This study explored narrative responses following abnormal Pap tests among Hispanic migrant farmworkers ( N = 18; ages 22-50 years) via in-depth interviews in Florida. Qualitative analyses utilized health literacy domains (obtain/process/understand/communicate) as a conceptual framework. Participants described how they (1) obtained information about getting a Pap test, (2) processed positive and negative reactions following results, (3) understood results and recommended health-promoting behaviors, and (4) communicated and received social support. Women had disparate reactions and understanding following an abnormal Pap result. Health literacy was a meaningful conceptual framework to understand assets and gaps among women receiving an abnormal Pap test result. Future interventions should incorporate health literacy domains and facilitate patient-provider communications and social support to assist women in decision-making and health-promoting behaviors, ultimately decreasing cancer disparities.

Improving System Integration: The Art and Science of Engaging Small Community Practices in Health System Innovation.

UNLABELLED: This paper focuses on successful engagement strategies in recruiting and retaining primary care physicians (PCPs) in a quality improvement project, as perceived by family physicians in small practices. Sustained physician engagement is critical for quality improvement (QI) aiming to enhance health system integration. Although there is ample literature on engaging physicians in hospital or team-based practice, few reports describe factors influencing engagement of community-based providers practicing with limited administrative support. The PCPs we describe participated in SCOPE: Seamless Care Optimizing the Patient Experience, a QI project designed to support their care of complex patients and reduce both emergency department (ED) visits and inpatient admissions. SCOPE outcome measures will inform subsequent papers. All the 30 participating PCPs completed surveys assessing perceptions regarding the importance of specific engagement strategies. Project team acknowledgement that primary care is challenging and new access to patient resources were the most important factors in generating initial interest in SCOPE. The opportunity to improve patient care via integration with other providers was most important in their commitment to participate, and a positive experience with project personnel was most important in their continued engagement. Our experience suggests that such providers respond well to personalized, repeated, and targeted engagement strategies.